Pain Tolerance
(1) There is no Planet Earth.
(2) There is only a torture machine.
(3) It tortures people to the maximum extent possible.
(4) That is all it does.
(5) Nothing could possibly get the torture machine to reconsider the obvious stupidity of what it does.
(6) It forces people to undergo pain for no reason.
(7) It forces not only pro-pain people to suffer.
(8) It forces all people to suffer.
(9) The nature of ethical people most likely restricts the amount of pain that a person can suffer.
(10) Every ethical person most likely suffers at the hands of the torture machine for about 30 years.
(11) After that point in time, pain issues decline massively.
(12) The ability to inflict pain on that person has mostly ended.
(13) Throughout human history, people have suffered under this torture machine.
(14) The torture machine has created many revolutionaries.
(15) There are a large number of intuitive personality types who have suffered at the hands of the torture machine.
(16) As a result, they became revolutionaries.
(17) They declared war on society.
(18) They attempted to destroy society.
(19) They worked endlessly on this cause.
(20) They found that it was almost impossible to make anything happen.
(21) When they reached about 30 years old, they found that the pain went into decline.
(22) As a result, they quit the movement.
(23) This has happened endlessly throughout human history.
(24) The entire Bible was largely written about these people.
(25) The most recent revolutionaries before myself were Fidel Castro (1950s), Bob Dylan (1960s), John Lennon (1970s), and U2 (1980s).
(26) The first revolutionary was the first N who the Bible calls Cain.
(27) Cain killed his brother Able because his brother engaged in the practice of killing and eating animals.
And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?
And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.
And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand;
When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear.
Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me. (Genesis 4:9-14)
(28) All ethical people are more conflict oriented between the ages of 10 and 30.
(29) They all eventually give up and sell out.
(30) They assume the problem is gone when it is not.
(31) It is time for the ethical people of the world to get back on the clock.
(32) If you do not, you are going out with the trash.
U2 – Seconds
Lightning flashes across the sky
East to west, do or die
Like a thief in the night
See the world by candlelight
Fall, rise and fall, rise and
In an apartment on Time Square
You can assemble them anywhere
Held to ransom, Hell to pay
A revolution everyday
USSR, DDR, London, New York, Peking
It’s the puppets, it’s the puppets
Who pull the strings, yeah (U2, Seconds)
The Matrix
MORPHEUS
. . . The Matrix is everywhere, it’s all around us, here even in this room. You can see it out your window or on your television. You feel it when you go to work, or go to church or pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
NEO
What truth?
MORPHEUS
That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, kept inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch.
. . .
MORPHEUS
When the Matrix was first built there was a man born inside that had the ability to change what he wanted, to remake the Matrix as he saw fit. It was this man that freed the first of us and taught us the truth; as long as the Matrix exists, the human race will never be free. He pauses. When he died, the Oracle prophesied his return and envisioned that his coming would hail the destruction of the Matrix, an end to the war and freedom for our people. That is why there are those of us that have spent our entire lives searching the Matrix, looking for him.
. . .
MORPHEUS
The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. But when you are inside and you look around, what do you see; businessmen, lawyers, teachers, carpenters. The minds of the very people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of the system and that makes them our enemy. (The Matrix, Warner Brothers Pictures, 1999)
The Law Of Self-Interest
(1) The law of nature is the law of love.
(2) The law of love is the law of harm.
(3) Harm is inherently undesirable.
(4) Nobody could like it.
(5) Nobody could want it.
(6) Good people are self-interested.
(7) They want to avoid harm.
(8) Bad people are not self-interested.
(9) They do not want to avoid harm.
(10) Self-sacrafice is never necessary.
(11) Self-sacrafice is never truly self-sacrifice.
(12) If a person is self-sacraficing, they are sacrificing for you too.
Starving Please Help!
Steve Ray Evans, who uses a sign to ask drivers for money, has been successfully suing Utah cities that have cited him for panhandling, arguing that his right to free speech is being violated by a state statute that bans soliciting near roadways.
“This is my only source of income,” said Mr. Evans, 54, whose sign reads “Starving Please Help!” “I do it for survival purposes. I feel as though a lot of other individuals depend on it, too.”
Mr. Evans said he had received more than 50 panhandling citations, and cases like his have become increasingly common of late. With the downturn in the economy, cities across the country have been cracking down on an apparent rise in aggressive panhandling, while advocates for the homeless and civil liberties groups contend that sweeping bans on begging go too far. (New York Times, October 5, 2012)
America’s Anarchist Constitution
(1) Common Law is a universal legal code that was invented in London.
(2) It was based on the law of nature.
(3) It was famously systematized in Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries On The Law Of England.
(4) It is universally accepted by all countries of the world.
(5) It is universally accepted by US state courts.
(6) It is accepted by US federal courts as federal law.
(7) The Common Law was adopted because of its cohesion with the American Constitution.
(8) In particular, the federal courts have ruled that the Common Law doctrine of Necessity was federal law.
NECESSITY is, essentially, a utilitarian defense. See Note, The State Made Me Do It: The Applicability of the Necessity Defense to Civil Disobedience, 39 Stan.L.Rev. 1173, 1174 (1987). It therefore JUSTIFIES CRIMINAL ACTS taken to avert a greater harm, maximizing social welfare by allowing a crime to be committed where the social benefits of the crime outweigh the social costs of failing to commit the crime. See, e.g., Dorrell, 758 F.2d at 432 (recognizing that “the policy underlying the necessity defense is the promotion of greater values at the expense of lesser values.”) (citation omitted). Pursuant to the defense, prisoners could ESCAPE a burning prison, see, e.g., Baender v. Barnett, 255 U.S. 224, 226, 41 S.Ct. 271, 272, 65 L.Ed. 597 (1921); a person lost in the woods could STEAL food from a cabin to survive, see Posner, An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 85 Colum.L.Rev. 1193, 1205 (1985); an embargo could be violated because adverse weather conditions necessitated sale of the cargo at a foreign port, see The William Gray, 29 F.Cas. 1300, 1302 (C.C.D.N.Y. 1810)(No. 17,694); a crew could MUTINY where their ship was thought to be unseaworthy, see United States v. Ashton, 24 F.Cas. 873, 874 (C.C.D. Mass. 1834)(No. 14,470); and property could be destroyed to prevent the spread of fire, see, e.g., Surocco v. Geary, 3 Cal. 69, 74 (1853).
What all the traditional necessity cases have in common is that the commission of the “crime” averted the occurrence of an even greater “harm.” In some sense, the necessity defense allows us to act as INDIVIDUAL LEGISLATURES, amending a particular criminal provision or crafting a one-time exception to it, subject to court review, when a real legislature would formally do the same under those circumstances. For example, by allowing prisoners who escape a burning jail to claim the justification of necessity, we assume the lawmaker, confronting this problem, would have allowed for an exception to the law proscribing prison escapes. (United States v. Schoon, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 1991)
The same common sense accepts the ruling, cited by Plowden that the statute of 1st Edward II, which enacts that a prisoner who breaks prison shall be guilty of felony does not extend to a prisoner who breaks out when the prison is on fire — “for he is not to be HANGED because he would not stay to be burnt.” (United States v. Kirby, U.S. Supreme Court, 1868)
(9) This doctrine says that any law may be violated, if harm will be avoided in the process.
(10) This doctrine says that people are individual legislatures.
(11) People are subject to the demands of their happiness alone.
(12) People do not have to follow any law other than the law of their own wellbeing.
(13) Any inconsistent law is automatically amended.
(14) This individual legislature legal doctrine is based on Kantian Anarchism.
It would seem, then, that there can be no resolution of the conflict between the autonomy of the individual and the putative authority of the state. Insofar as a man fulfills his obligation to make himself the author of his decisions, he will resist the state’s claim to have authority over him. (Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism, 1998)
(15) Based on this Necessity doctrine, laws that regulate non-harmful behavior restrain nobody.
(16) They are illegal.
(17) These cases discuss specific laws that this doctrine is intended to repair.
(18) It is intended to repair theft laws.
(19) This doctrine permits a person to steal property to promote their wellbeing.
(20) This doctrine permits a person to defend against the consequences of theft, such as lynching by police and corporate security.
(21) The US Constitution is no different from the Common Law Necessity doctrine.
(22) The US Constitution makes it illegal to regulate behavior that is not harmful.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to ALTER or to ABOLISH it . . . in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. (Declaration of Independence, 1776)
We the People of the United States, in Order to . . . promote the general WELFARE, and secure the Blessings of LIBERTY . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. (US Constitution, 1787)
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. (US Constitution, Bill of Rights, 1787)
(23) The US Constitution holds that people are individual legislatures.
(24) They can nullify laws that regulate non-harmful behavior at their will.
(25) Based on the US Constitution, the US Supreme Court has held that the government may never regulate non-harmful behavior.
“It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the GOVERNMENT MAY NOT ENTER.” . . . Had those who drew and ratified the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment known the components of liberty in its manifold possibilities, they might have been more specific. They did not presume to have this insight. . . . As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom.” (Lawrence v. Texas, US Supreme Court, 2003)
(26) The US Supreme Court has held that the Second Amendment permits formation of a private military to police authority.
A well regulated MILITIA, being necessary to the security of a FREE STATE, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (US Constitution, Bill of Rights, 1787)
militia – a body of citizens organized for military service (Merriam-Webster, 2012)
It is therefore entirely sensible that the Second Amendment’s prefatory clause announces the purpose for which the right was codified: to prevent elimination of the militia. The prefatory clause does not suggest that preserving the militia was the only reason Americans valued the ancient right; most undoubtedly thought it even more important for self-defense and hunting. But the threat that the new Federal Government would destroy the citizens’ militia by taking away their arms was the reason that right—unlike some other English rights—was codified in a written Constitution. (District of Columbia v. Heller, US Supreme Court, 2008)
(27) The US Supreme Court has held that anti-terrorism laws violate the Second Amendment.
We hold that §§ 2(a)(1), 2(a)(3) and 3 of the Smith Act do not inherently, or as construed or applied in the instant case, violate the First Amendment and other provisions of the Bill of Rights, or the First and Fifth Amendments BECAUSE OF INDEFINITENESS. Petitioners intended to overthrow the Government of the United States as speedily as the circumstances would permit. Their conspiracy [p517] to organize the Communist Party and to teach and advocate the overthrow of the Government of the United States by force and violence created a “clear and present danger” of an attempt to overthrow the Government by force and violence. They were PROPERLY and CONSTITUTIONALLY convicted for violation of the Smith Act. (Dennis v. United States, US Supreme Court, 1951)
(28) The US Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment prohibits all censorship of words, including the word fuck.
Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . . (US Constitution, Bill of Rights, 1787)
[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures — and that means not only informed and responsible criticism, but the freedom to speak foolishly and without moderation. . . . Finally, and in the same vein, we cannot indulge the facile assumption that one can FORBID particular WORDS without also running a substantial risk of suppressing ideas in the process. . . . It is, in sum, our judgment that, absent a more particularized and compelling reason for its actions, the State may not, consistently with the First and Fourteenth Amendments, make the simple public display here involved of this single FOUR-LETTER EXPLETIVE a criminal offense. (Cohen v. California, US Supreme Court, 1971)
(29) The US Supreme Court has held that flag burning is protected by the First Amendment.
And, precisely because it is our flag that is involved, one’s response to the flag-burner [p420] may exploit the uniquely persuasive power of the flag itself. . . . We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in doing so we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents. (Texas v. Johnson, US Supreme Court, 1971)
(30) Lynchers cannot be empowered.
(31) The US Supreme Court has held compulsory education laws violate the First Amendment.
Nothing we hold is intended to undermine the general applicability of the State’s compulsory school attendance statutes or to limit the power of the State to promulgate reasonable standards . . . . (Wisconsin v. Yoder, US Supreme Court, 1972)
(32) The US Supreme Court has established a radical socialist state managed economy in US law.
(33) The US Constitution says that all people are equal.
all men are created equal . . . . (Declaration of Independence, 1776)
No State shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (US Constitution, Amendment XIV, 1787)
(34) The US Supreme Court has held that all people have the right to equal property.
(35) Employment may never be a legal requirement, even for obtaining property.
“[I]f some carefree type of fellow is satisfied to work just so much, and no more, as will pay for one square meal, some wine, and a flophouse daily, but a court thinks this kind of living subhuman, the fellow can be forced to raise his sights or go to jail as a vagrant.”
. . .
But the RULE OF LAW implies EQUALITY and justice in its application. Vagrancy laws of the Jacksonville type teach that the scales of justice are so tipped that even-handed administration of the law is not possible. The rule of law, evenly applied to minorities as well as majorities, to the POOR as well as the RICH, is the great mucilage that HOLDS SOCIETY TOGETHER. (Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, US Supreme Court, 1972)
(36) This socialist economy was further discussed by Brennan in a dissenting opinion.
The problem of housing for the poor is one of the most acute facing the Nation. The poor are relegated to ghettos and are beset by substandard housing at exorbitant rents. Because of their lack of bargaining power, the poor are made to accept onerous lease terms. Summary eviction proceeds are the order of the day. Default judgment in eviction proceedings are obtained in machinegun rapidity, since the indigent cannot afford counsel to defend. Housing laws often have a built-in bias against the poor. Slumlords have a tight hold on the Nation.
. . .
The plight of the poor is being somewhat AMELIORATED by federal and state programs (particularly the Neighborhood Legal Services under OEO)and by private organizations dedicated to the representation of indigents in civil matters.This Court of course does not sit to CURE SOCIAL ILLS that beset the country. But when we are faced with a statute that apparently violates the EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE by patently DISCRIMINATING against the POOR and thereby WORSENING their already SORRY PLIGHT, we should address ourselves to it. I would grant certiorari. (Williams v. Shaffner, US Supreme Court, 1967)
(38) The Supreme Court has held that the right to privacy prohibits all regulation of sex, including rape, minors, and prostitution.
The present case does not involve MINORS.It does not involve persons who might be INJURED or COERCED or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or PROSTITUTION. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter. The case does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent from each other, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The STATE CANNOT DEMEAN their existence or CONTROL their destiny by making their private SEXUAL CONDUCT a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. “It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.” Casey, supra, at 847. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual. (Lawrence v. Texas, US Supreme Court, 2003)
(39) The Supreme Court has held that no person can be forced to undergo medical care.
The common sense of man approves the judgment mentioned by Puffendorf that the Bolognian law which enacted, “that whoever drew blood in the streets should be punished with the utmost severity” did not extend to the surgeon who opened the vein of a person that fell down in the street in a fit. (United States v. Kirby, U.S. Supreme Court, 1868)
(40) The Declaration of Independence recognized that individual people have a right to declare independence from a country.
(40) Based on this, the Supreme Court has held that their is a right to independence.
(41) The Supreme Court has done this in its tribal law.
(42) The Supreme Court has held that tribes are sovereign.
(43) This is based on their right to independence.
This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession.
…
After bestowing on this subject a degree of attention which was more required by the magnitude of the interest in litigation, and the able and elaborate arguments of the bar, than by its intrinsic difficulty, the court is decidedly of opinion, that the plaintiffs do not exhibit a title which can be sustained in the courts of the United States, and that there is no error in the judgment which was rendered against them in the District Court of Illinois. (Johnson v. McIntosh, US Supreme Court, 1823)
If it be true that the Cherokee Nation have rights, this is not the tribunal in which those rights are to be asserted. If it be true that wrongs have been inflicted, and that still greater are to be apprehended, this is not the tribunal which can redress the past or prevent the future. (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, US Supreme Court, 1831)
They have little relevance to the principles which lead us to conclude that Indian tribes do not have inherent jurisdiction to try and to punish non-Indians. (Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, US Supreme Court, 1978)
(44) Tribes are an oppressed group of people.
(45) The created their own independent social system.
(46) The Supreme Court recognized their right to independence.
(47) Shanty towns are also sovereign based on this right to independence.
Shanty towns ruled sovereign, just like tribes.
Homeless people are getting checks for property destroyed during Sacramento police raids on illegal campsites.
The Loaves & Fishes homeless services complex is one of several locations where checks ranging from $400 to $750 are being distributed. Those will addresses are getting checks in the mail.
The Sacramento Bee (sacb.ee/SoHhwO) says the payments resolve a class-action lawsuit claiming police violated the constitutional rights of homeless people by seizing and destroying their property during cleanup operations since 2005.
The federal lawsuit said police officers took bicycles, tents and other items without giving the owners a chance to get them back.
It’s costing taxpayers $796,050 in payments to 1,143 people.
The city is still fighting a requested $1.8 million in legal fees. (San Francisco Chronicle, October 3,2012)
Potomac River Rescue
(1) On, the day that he was born, Steve Trask broke 5 world records.
(2) One of his unmentioned accomplishments was a visit at the hospital from many elite people, including President Ronald Reagan.
(3) When Steve Trask was only 1 year old, the White House (in Washington DC) contacted his parents on behalf of President Reagan.
(4) They offered them a free trip to Washington DC.
(5) The trip was not a conventional trip.
(6) They mentioned that the only way to get to Washington DC was on a military transport airplane.
(7) At this point in time, there was no Washington DC Airport.
(8) Dulles was the closest airport, but it was not a true DC airport.
(9) Flying on a military plane to Andrew’s Airforce Base was the only way to travel to Washington DC.
(10) It was not possible to travel on roads.
(11) The general public could not get access to Washington DC.
(12) Road access to the city was totally blocked off by the Secret Service for security reasons.
(13) Nobody lived in Washington DC except government employees.
(14) There was no members of Congress.
(15) There was government agencies, but the agencies only had leaders.
(16) They had no other employees.
(17) All agency leaders worked at the White House.
(18) The White House was 1 of 2 operational government buildings in Washington DC.
(19) About 50 employees worked at the White House.
(20) The 9 Supreme Court justices alone worked at the Supreme Court building.
(21) The White House was so short on people to be agency leaders that the White House made White House secretaries agency leaders.
(22) This governmental system was in place since the US was founded.
(23) The world has always suffered under the oppression of anti-elite people.
(24) The US has suffered under the same people.
(25) As a result, Washington DC was an outlaw concept throughout the entire history of the US.
(26) President Reagan gave Washington DC a boost unlike it had seen since George Washington.
(27) It was still in bad shape though.
(28) He hoped that inviting Steve Trask to the city might help out.
(29) Steve Trask and his parents flew to Washington DC on a military transport plane when he was 1 year old.
(30) They were transported in a large military transport plane that can carry vehicles.
(31) They were transported in their personal vehicle, which was a Cheverolet Chevette.
(32) The White House had no vehicles to transport people with.
(33) There was no rental cars.
(34) Coming in with your own car was the only option.
(35) They unloaded at Andrew’s Airforce Base.
(36) They drove to the White House.
(37) At the White House, they got out of their car.
(38) A person at the White House told them, which sites they should check out.
(39) They told them to check out the White House, Washington Monument, and Lincoln Memorial.
(40) They did not tell them to check out Congress because it had never been operational.
(41) They did not tell them to check out the Supreme Court because they did not know it was operational.
(42) The people at the White House were concerned about whether Steve Trask would be able to walk around to the sites.
(43) As a result, they gave his parents a baby carrier that attaches to the front of the parent.
(44) It was apparently some new modernized baby carrying concept.
(45) This ended up being a useless gesture.
(46) He was able to walk well at 1 year old.
(47) As a result, he walked on his own to all of the sites.
(48) When his family visited the White House, his parents pointed out the location in the White House where the President lives.
(49) They told him that there are Secret Service Agents that guard the White House.
(50) They told him that the White House had very strong glass that could protect the President against a bomb attack.
(51) The White House people apparently told them about this stuff.
(52) Toward the end of the day, his parents realized that they missed visiting the Capitol Building.
(53) They were driving through Washington DC on their way out.
(54) They were having a lot of trouble getting through because the streets were packed with cars.
(55) Earlier in the day, there was very few people around in the city.
(56) While driving on their way out, they noticed a lot of traffic on a particular street.
(57) They realized that the Capitol Building was on this street.
(58) It was the reason for all of the traffic.
(59) They were very concerned that they missed the Capitol Building.
(60) As a result, they drove down the street and by the Capitol Building.
(61) The Capitol Building and Congress became operational during his visit.
(62) As a result, there was an influx of people that were interested in the checking out the newly opened Capitol Building.
(63) At the end of the day, his family went back to Detroit.
(64) As a result of his visit to Washington DC, many of the problems with the government were fixed.
(65) There was a massive influx of new government employees.
(66) All 3 branches and most agencies became operational.
(67) The government stopped blocking off access to Washington DC.
(68) The city had a massive influx of residents and tourists.
(69) It became an impressive city.
(70) Reagan mentioned Steve Trask’s visit to Washington DC in his January 26, 1982 State of the Union Address.
(71) This speech was supposed to have been about 15 days before the day he was born.
(72) This was not the actual date on which the speech was given.
(73) It was actually given about 1 year after he was born.
(74) It was given after his visit to Washington DC.
(75) Reagan may have done a new version of the prior State of the Union address after the government became operational.
(76) In his speech, President Reagan recognized an act of heroism by Lenny Skutnik.
Just two weeks ago, in the midst of a terrible tragedy on the Potomac, we saw again the spirit of American heroism at its finest the heroism of dedicated rescue workers saving crash victims from icy waters. And we saw the heroism of one of our young Government employees, Lenny Skutnik, who, when he saw a woman lose her grip on the helicopter line, dived into the water and dragged her to safety.
(77) This was an underhanded reference to Steve Trask saving the Federal Government in Washington DC.
ANNOTATIONS
Now his [Jesus] parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover. And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast. And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem . . . . And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers. (Luke 2:41-47)
For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings. (Isaiah 7:16)
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder . . . . (Isaiah 9:6)
I am a transient. Can I get 2 corndogs to go?
The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb . . . And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together . . . . (Isaiah 11:6-7)
Write-In-Presidential-Candidate
(1) Write-In-Candidates are a tradition as old as the US Constitution.
(2) There have been numerous Write-In-Candidates throughout US history.
(3) All state governments have regulations for qualifying as a presidential candidate.
(4) They also have regulations that govern Write-In-Candidates.
(5) These regulations are incriminating.
(6) There is no space on ballots for Write-In-Candidates.
(7) The names of Write-In-Candidates are written by voters on the ballot.
(8) This is an inherently subversive concept.
(9) It exists to subvert problems that exist in the system for qualifying to be President.
(10) The US Supreme Court issued an unpublished opinion on this issue centuries ago.
(11) The opinion stated this.
(12) State governments use numerous illegal qualification standards.
(13) No person could ever qualify to be a candidate for President, even if they did everything that was required.
(14) The only way to repair these ballot access issues is to permit Write-In-Candidates.
(15) Write-In-Candidates have been a US tradition ever since.
(16) No Write-In-Candidates have used the government system for Write-In-Candidates.
(17) Numerous Presidents became President as Write-In-Candidates.
(18) Anti-elite biases have made it difficult for good people to become candidates for President.
(19) As a result, they had to become President as Write-In-Candidates.
(20) The Religious Guru is the rightful leader of the world based on the law of nature. (MASTERmind)
(21) Only smart people are qualified to lead the world.
(22) The Religious Guru is, by effect, the rightful President of the US.
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder . . . . Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end . . . . (Isaiah 9:6-7)
(23) The Religious Guru will be a Write-In-Candidate for the 2012 presidential election.
(24) He will be a presidential candidate.
(25) He will have a vice presidential candidate.
(26) Nicki Minaj (aka Fem-Federala) will be his vice presidential candidate.
Hey hey hey, ya know
It just dawned on me
I am Nicki Minaj
Ha ha
I ain’t know the president live in DC
And I ain’t know they call me Nicki Lewinskie
. . .
I think I’m gonna kill tha mutha fuckin’ DJ
If he don’t p-p-pull up, let that record replay
R-r-record replay, r-r-record replay.
I think I’m gonna kill the mutha fuckin’ DJ
. . .
I ain’t know the police was the babylon
And I ain’t know I’m cold just like an avalanche
(27) Nicky Minaj has already received a strong endorsement from the National Journal.
The role of the vice president as attack dog is well-established . . . . The president has a wing man . . . .
(28) Vote Trask/Minaj in the 2012 Presidential election.
(29) Do not forget to register to vote.
(30) Do not assume that you can show up to vote without prior registration.
(31) Write their names clearly on the ballot in the presidential section.
(32) Both are associated with the anarchist political ideology.
(33) If elected, Nicki Minaj will live at the White House in Washington DC.
(34) The Religious Guru will remain in California.
(35) Both have a right to be President based on the Equal Protection Clause.
(36) All regulations that limit their right to be President are unconstitutional.
Street Musicians
(1) Homeless people should do street performing in urban areas.
(2) They should use a clarinet.
Barcelona 200 Series B-Flat Clarinet
(3) They should read about this system for playing music.
(4) They should play these songs.
(a) When Johnny Comes Marching Home
(b) Louis Armstrong – What a Wonderful World
(c) Israel Kamakawiwoʻole – Somewhere Over the Rainbow
(d) Elton John – Can You Feel the Love Tonight
(5) They should play them in loop.
Bring the mob to your local town.
And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee. (Leviticus 25:35)
Therefore their goods shall become a booty . . . . (Zephaniah 1:13)
(1) Organized Crime was founded during the early Twentieth Century.
(2) Organized Crime was not founded to subvert the law.
(3) Organized Crime was founded to enforce the law.
(4) Nobody in society follows the law.
(5) Everyone in society assumes that authority is above the law.
(6) Everyone assumes that people have no right to defense against illegal actions by authority.
(7) Everyone assumes that people have no right to steal to promote their own wellbeng.
(8) Organized crime performs these functions.
(a) Organized crime is a non-profit religious corporation.
(b) It polices authority.
(c) It police civilians.
(d) It provides access to the wealth that society denies people.
(e) It provides access to banned goods and services that are not harmful.
(9) Organized Crime is jihadist.
(10) Organized Crime requires that people pay for protection.
(11) Organized Crime provides security to society.
(12) It requires that society pay a fee for this protection.
(13) It takes out people who refuse to pay their fee.
(14) It does not take out people who have an excuse for paying such as inability to pay.
(15) People are always warned about the consequence of not paying before they are taken out.
(16) The fee is never collected.
(17) This system is just a test of people’s willingness to pay to preserve their life.
(18) Organized Crime should distribute prostitution, pornography, erotic dancing, and lingerie.
(19) Organized Crime should steal money from banks with electric Hobart Welders and sledge hammers.
(20) Organized Crime people should have an organized crime image.
Joe Walsh – Life’s Been Good
I have a mansion forget the price
Ain’t never been there they tell me it’s nice
I live in hotels tear out the walls
I have accountants pay for it all
They say I’m crazy but I have a good time
I’m just looking for clues at the scene of the crime
Life’s been good to me so far
My Maserati does 185
I lost my license now I don’t drive
I have a limo ride in the back
I lock the doors in case I’m attacked
Bob Dylan – Like A Rolling Stone
Once upon a time you dressed so fine
You threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn’t you?
People’d call, say, “Beware doll, you’re bound to fall”
You thought they were all kiddin’ you
You used to laugh about
Everybody that was hangin’ out
Now you don’t talk so loud
Now you don’t seem so proud
About having to be scrounging for your next meal
How does it feel
How does it feel
To be without a home
Like a complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?
You’ve gone to the finest school all right, Miss Lonely
But you know you only used to get juiced in it
And nobody has ever taught you how to live on the street
And now you find out you’re gonna have to get used to it
You said you’d never compromise
With the mystery tramp, but now you realize
He’s not selling any alibis
As you stare into the vacuum of his eyes
And ask him do you want to make a deal?
How does it feel
How does it feel
To be on your own
With no direction home
Like a complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?
You never turned around to see the frowns on the jugglers and the clowns
When they all come down and did tricks for you
You never understood that it ain’t no good
You shouldn’t let other people get your kicks for you
You used to ride on the chrome horse with your diplomat
Who carried on his shoulder a Siamese cat
Ain’t it hard when you discover that
He really wasn’t where it’s at
After he took from you everything he could steal
How does it feel
How does it feel
To be on your own
With no direction home
Like a complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?
Princess on the steeple and all the pretty people
They’re drinkin’, thinkin’ that they got it made
Exchanging all kinds of precious gifts and things
But you’d better lift your diamond ring, you’d better pawn it babe
You used to be so amused
At Napoleon in rags and the language that he used
Go to him now, he calls you, you can’t refuse
When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose
You’re invisible now, you got no secrets to conceal
How does it feel
How does it feel
To be on your own
With no direction home
Like a complete unknown
Like a rolling stone?
Styx – Hangman
Oh mama, I’m in fear for my life from the long arm of the law
Lawman has put an end to my runnin’
And I’m so far from my home
Oh, Mama, I can hear you a cryin’
You’re so scared and all alone
Hangman is comin’ down from the gallows
And I don’t have very long
ACDC – TNT
Women to the left of me
And women to the right
Ain’t got no gun
Ain’t got no knife
But don’t you start no fight
. . .
‘Cause I’m T.N.T. I’m dynamite
T.N.T. and I’ll win the fight
T.N.T. I’m a power load
T.N.T. watch me explode
. . .
I’m a wanted man
Public enemy number one
Understand
So lock up your daughter
Lock up your wife
Lock up your back door
And run for your life
The man is back in town
The Right To Bear Machetes
And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee. (Leviticus 25:35)
I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: . . . Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. (Revelation 3:15-20)
And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt. (Exodus 12:13)
And Samuel said, As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women. And Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the LORD in Gilgal. (1 Samuel 15:33)
(1) People call the Rwandan Genocide a genocide.
The Rwandan Genocide was the 1994 mass murder of an estimated 800,000 people in the small East African nation of Rwanda.
Most of the victims were killed in their own villages or in towns, often by their neighbors and fellow villagers. The militia typically murdered victims by machetes, although some army units used rifles. The Hutu gangs searched out victims hiding in churches and school buildings, and massacred them. Local officials and government-sponsored radio incited ordinary citizens to kill their neighbors, and those who refused to kill were often murdered on the spot. “Either you took part in the massacres or you were massacred yourself.”
(2) It would be more accurate to call it a massacre.
(3) The machete has been the weapon of choice for jihadists since the Old Testament.
(4) It is the poor man’s tool of choice.
(5) It is the poor man’s weapon of choice.
(6) Machetes are inexpensive, easy to obtain, and legal everywhere.
(7) Every home must have a machete.
(8) It must be displayed prominently on a wall of the house.
(9) Bomb or be bombed.
Al Capone And His Gal
Al Capone
Fruit of the Loom Boxer Briefs
His Gal
Accessories
Al Capone Sweets Cognac Cigars
Dining Out
Jewish Orthodox Chief Rabbis Declare Non-Orthodox Hell Bound
Amar says Reform and Conservative movements “poisoning the wells of holiness,” leading followers to “nethermost pit.”
Chief Rabbis Shlomo Amar and Yona Metzger spoke out fiercely against the Reform and Conservative movements on Tuesday at an emergency conference of rabbis organized by Amar.
Approximately 150 rabbis from around the country attended the meeting, along with Minister of Housing and Construction Ariel Atias, Minister of Religious Services Yaakov Margi and several religious MKs.
Chief Rabbi Amar said during his address to the assembled clergy that while secular people in Israel are “thirsty” for spiritual input,” the non-Orthodox movements “are poisoning the well of holiness and taking people to nethermost pit.”
He explained that the struggle he has undertaken against state recognition of non-Orthodox rabbis is “to protect the Jewish people” from the danger of an irreparable split in the Jewish people which might be engendered by the “real halachic dangers” of recognizing non-Orthodox movements in Israel. (Jerusalem Post, 6/26/2012)
TERROR TALK 
You must be logged in to post a comment.